How the ManKind Project Survived the End of “the Men’s Movement”

5 July 2008


Historians, if they remember the mythopoetic men’s movement at all, place it roughly between 1990 and 1993.  Everyone seemed to be talking about men.  Robert Bly’s Iron John and Sam Keen’s Fire in the Belly were each bestsellers.  And then off the media radar.  The men’s movement was dead.  Or was it?  One organization survived, even thrived, through it all: the New Warrior Network (NWN), later renamed ManKind Project (MKP).

The New Warrior Network had benefited from the boom years of the movement, certainly, but it also saw uninterrupted growth through the 1990s.  Where five regional centers existed in 1991 and nine in 1992, a full 23 cities had Training Adventure weekends established by 1996.  Some 10,000 men had been initiated by summer of the following year; by summer 2006, 32,000 had been through the weekend training.  The NWN renamed itself “ManKind Project” in 1996 for publicity purposes, but the mission remained relatively steady.  Despite high costs for new initiates ($500-$600 for a weekend) and demanding schedules for the volunteers, the organization has expanded well beyond its initial scope.


How has the ManKind Project (MKP) sustained itself?  At first glance, it may have seemed the least likely to survive.  New Warrior weekends received some of the most disparaging media coverage.  The organization had even caught flack from Bly himself, calling it a quick-fix and a caricature of the warrior archetype.  In a devastating turn of events, Ron Hering, one of the founders, was murdered in 1993.  How did it manage to press on, even thrive?  Four things appear to have set it apart: 1) simplification of principles, 2) an outline for progress, 3) federated centralization, and 4) an evangelistic temperament.  These factors made it possible to outlast the boom.


First, MKP managed to boil its beliefs down to a minimum.  Other expressions in the movement were so open-ended as to appear either muddled or dismissed as “New Agey.”  The New Warrior Training Adventure weekends were able to focus on several key issues: getting men comfortable with each other, affirmation of male worth, grappling with family wounds, and formulation of a life mission.  A modest set of wisdom could be imparted over the three-day event, enough to feel like true initiation had occurred.  This initiation was understood to be a starting point, an entrance into male maturity.  Moreover, the ManKind Project felt no need to multiply endless archetypes.  Stories and images could be helpful, but the important thing was having a workable theory.  This fell into place for them with Robert Moore’s work on the four-fold king, warrior, magician, lover.  Moore became the unofficial theorist of the masculine soul, speaking at MKP conferences and expositing his anthropology in print.  The organization also loosely appropriated Joseph Campbell’s stages of the hero journey as a paradigm for men’s lives.  It was a manageable system in which to work.    


Secondly, MKP offered a blueprint for masculine progress.  After the initiation, having been introduced to the male mysteries, a man is given the next step.  The microcosm of the “I-groups” allows men to process the weekend, bond with each other, and work on personal issues.  Starting shortly after the weekend experience, these groups might last anywhere from eight weeks to several years, two to three hours a session.  From there participants are encouraged to oversee other initiation weekends, or perhaps seek further training, as in Bill Kauth’s “Warrior Monk” program.    Men have responded well to having some manner of structure, instead of having to invent their own way forward.  Where other mythopoetic strands preferred a laissez faire model, the ManKind Project provides a plan for masculine growth.  In the same vein, MKP’s activities have appealed to a spirit of “manly” proactivity that has usually already been inculcated in its participants.  In my own experience, the most frequently used phrase in MKP is “Good work, men.”  The training materials and suggested readings reinforce this approach, emphasizing self-determination, while giving practical steps to make that happen.


Third, naturally, MKP’s growth was made possible by centralization of the organization.  From the outset its founders desired to maximize the program.  Kauth was clearly the most important presence within MKP, but he believed strongly that the programs would only grow if managed under local leadership.  While he, Tosi, and Hering had disproportionate control in the early years, they found ways to flatten the hierarchy as the organization expanded.  What resulted was a presbyterian polity, something analogous to the United States government’s balance of powers.  In 1991 the organization established a board consisting of one voting representative from each center.  In 1993 an “executive training director” was appointed to ease the burden on local leaders, and after that numerous “chairs” were added as an executive branch.  Certification of leaders was established, as was the writing of the “Governance and Council” guidelines.  As one leader of the movement conceded, “To become bureaucratic is inevitable.”   By creating a federation that governed both locally and nationally, the MKP adopted polity that had shown itself viable in America.


Finally, ManKind Project was evangelistic.  By this one should not hear “Evangelical,” “doctrinaire,” or even “proselytizing.”  Spirituality, being attached only to humanistic principles, allowed the organization to claim, “[W]e don’t invest any of the rituals we use with religious significance.”   MKP, nonetheless, was built on a fairly aggressive word-of-mouth network.  They understood themselves as having a mission to redeem men, and this mission meant initiating and training others.  In language reminiscent of Christian revivalism, Robert Moore once said at rally, “The ManKind Project, I believe, represents a sincere effort to try and create for the first time in the history of our species a vessel of masculine initiation that strives truly to be inclusive . . . . This is a new thing on this planet – a grandiose undertaking, but a worthy undertaking that we have decided to work on.”  He finished by saying, “These are the words I want to leave with you – Keep love alive, keep love alive!  And if we keep love alive, my personal judgment is, nothing is going to stop us.”   In such a way, the MKP retained the belief that men, if truly initiated and transformed, could become the impetus to heal the world.  This gospel was used to recruit men for weekends and plug them into the leadership structures.  Unlike individualistic men’s groups, MKP anchored men within the fraternal system, actively generating a network of “warrior brothers.” 

ManKind Project presses on today.  It faces new organizational struggles, but the content of the programs and the charisma of the participants remain.  In all likelihood MKP will not initiate a new public phase of a men’s movement – but if it stays the course it should darn well survive the next. 

[For footnotes or bibliographical information, contact me.]






  1. Hey man – thank you for this article – I encourage you to submit this for inclusion into the next New Warrior Journal. I would also love to link to this from my blog – s’all right? – Best – Boysen

  2. Hello…I am a past friend of the late Ron Hering. I’m interested in finding out if his daughter, Rachel ever resurfaced. I kept in contact with two of Ron’s sons for several years after his death and they had lost touch with her as her mother had moved. Do you know anything about her? I would also love Cathy Kehoe’s e-mail address and Phil Bozanowski’s e-mail address as I’ve lost touch with them over the years
    I wold appreciate any help you could send me.
    Thank you,
    Kathy Harvey

  3. Kathy, I’m sorry to say I don’t have any of that information. Some other men with longer ties to MKP might be able to help you in your search. I would try the international office, and go from there.

  4. Thank you for the history lesson.

    As an initiated man living and attending i-group in Australia, I really valued this balanced take on MKP.

  5. […] I keep reading articles and testimonials about very satisfied MKP members who feel like the program has really helped them […]

  6. Just found your inspiring and refreshingly accurate article about the history of MKP. As its current chairman, I can tell you we are still here, still doing the work of initiating men, and we plan to be around for a long, long time. My vision is one million men sitting in circles telling each other the truth. Blessings.

    George Daranyi
    Chairman, MKP

  7. i read this article because i am a mature woman
    who has recently been getting to know
    a mature man who is one of your warriors.
    i have never met a sensitive man who was so clear and genuine and male, in all the good ways.
    you are doing good work,
    and as a woman,
    i thank you.

  8. Unfortunately my experience with MKP is fairly ambivalent. I loved the sense of community the affirmation of feeling, clearings, rituals etc. But the guts work I felt was overly simplistic and often abusive and group abuse. There was also incidents of older men exploiting younger men. And I have not seen MKP as an institution becoming squarely accountable for these flaws. Instead I read reports by some XMKP men as ALL bad and by other MKP men ALL good. I would love to see sometime a report that fairly critically analysed MKP for both what it has succeeded at as well as accurately points out it’s many flaws. Perhaps I should write it.

  9. Thanks for your take, Nathan. I bet deep meanings depend on really connective symbols that inspire wonder and probe understanding. So far, mkp helps me as no other method has. I also appreciate Matthews March 12 comment, and urge him to follow his intuition. Meanwhile, men sitting in circles and telling the truth remains a compelling image.

    • Kc (and others), thanks for your continued interest in this post. I’m interested in this October’s 25th anniversary conference of MKP. Will the organization be able to hold onto the legacy but also evolve? Will it be able to clarify its purposes and yet become more accountable? I hope these kinds of conversations will happen there in Louisville.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: